Chelsea State Bank ad

In case you missed it: Teamsters Local 214 ratifies contract with City of Chelsea

The Chelsea City Council and the 18 members of the Teamsters Local 214 reached a 3-year agreement on July 10, which does not include a wage increase in the first year, but leaves the door open for that possibility in the second and third years of the contract.

The union employees were commended by both City Manager John Hanifan for their willingness to negotiate and by Chelsea Mayor Jason Lindauer for the jobs they perform, many times in harsh weather conditions.

“These are the (city employees) who plow our streets, keep our power on, trim our tress and keep our water running,” Hanifan said, publicly thanking them for their hard work.

The contract runs through June 30, 2015, and negotiations have been underway between the two sides since April.

Hanifan said the group was willing to make “some pretty significant concessions,” which include an increase from 11 percent to 20 percent for their monthly medical premiums. Plus, the yearly maximum amount of medical reimbursement was capped at $2,500.

In addition, teamsters members will be paid double time for working on July 4, Christmas Day and New Year’s Day, or the observed holiday, but not both, and the acting foremen will receive foreman’s pay on the holiday only if they work the holiday.

Before the unanimous vote of the City Council on July 10, the union had ratified the contract “without the use of an expensive labor counsel,” the city manager said.

And although there are no raises in 2012, the city has agreed to re-open the contract in both 2013 and 2014 to discuss wage adjustments.

The new contract went into effect on July 1 and ends June 30, 2015.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

1 thought on “In case you missed it: Teamsters Local 214 ratifies contract with City of Chelsea”

  1. This had to be a difficult conclusion. So many people are without benefits, raises or jobs. Many don’t have pensions or other securities. Balancing the need of the whole community can be a real trick for a trustee – I know. I have heard grumblings about how well paid our employees are. I agree, in relation to the overall economy and for many in our community, it’s a nice package. I also support our workers. They do a great job and work as efficiently as possible.

    It’s all balance. What says the most to me is that they came together, worked something out, and council voted unanimously. I like the “open door” option for future years. If things turn around, it seems fair to offer our employees more money for their service.

    Thanks everyone!

Comments are closed.